All our lives we hear about the struggles between the two primary parties. Are they really relevant? I’m not so sure.
Well it’s finally here. The big day that so many have waited for. We gotta see who will prevail this time. Will the Republicans “take control” of the Senate? Will there be any shifts of power in the House?
This time I will stay off subject of how much any of it matters anyway. People who read my posts (all 6 of them) already know that I believe that the Congress is nothing more than a theater, and that the real shots are being called from behind the stage curtain. But that’s not today’s subject.
Today, Election Day, I want to focus on the elections. Or the process. The system that we all want to believe in as the basis of our “democracy” is corrupt. Seriously corrupt. Do we know about this? Perhaps a little, but not much since the major media doesn’t talk about it.
ELECTION DAY 2012
Barack Obama should not have won re-election in 2012. In fact I fully believe that he didn’t win; the election was stolen. But Randy, how can you say that? Well let’s just start with the polls leading up to Election Day 2012. All polls showed Obama as being anywhere from one to 3 or 4 percentage points behind. This was all major polls–not just “Republican-leaning” polls. All major polls. Are they biased? Of course they are to some degree. Almost all polls are “commissioned” by one group or another. But don’t just say “Ah well” and go drink a beer. THINK. If all major polls, INCLUDING those that are “Democrat-leaning,” say that Obama was behind then what is the liklihood that they were ALL wrong? I remember the news after the returns started to make it clear that Obama would win. Many people were shocked. Obama supporters naturally were delighted. But the people on the “inside” that follow such things closely were shocked. Even the ones who were happy with the outcome were shocked. And so was I.
Next is that I have done some homework. Hours and hours spent reading and listening to people who understand these things much better than I do. They explained that George Soros and others like him have been working intensely, in particular to control the outcome of elections. Their efforts started in 2000 but were insufficient to keep George Bush from being elected. There efforts were intensified and they fell just short of success in 2004. Of course they say that the election of 2004 was stolen. Whatever the truth there, they realized that their efforts were incomplete–that the tenticles of their forces did not extend far enough.
In the meantime “campaign reform” laws were passed in the first years of the decade of 2000. These reforms imposed limits on the amount that could be donated by individuals and groups to any candidate. But as usual there were loopholes, and George Soros and his ilk found ways to get around the new rules. An important one was by creating dozens and even hundreds of small organizations with innocent-sounding names that were really activist groups. They were allowed (maybe not intentionally allowed) to make large “on behalf of” donations. I remember reading that the total financial “power” of these groups was greater than the Democratic National Committee, and thus the DNC had become an afterthought in the whole process. These groups were now more important than the DNC in “steering” the Democrat Party.
But probably even more important was that from the “failed” experiences in 2000 and 2004 they realized that they needed to get “their” people into key positions at the state and local levels around the country. In most states it is the secretary of state position that is charged with overseeing election laws and such. Even when issues come up with recounts as we saw in Florida, the person in this seat is super important. And needless to say who leads and works in the local elections offices at the county or “parrish” level is also a very important matter. So this is what they did. They concentrated in getting the “right” people into these places.
What can the “right people” do? One thing that comes to mind right off is the reports (supported by videos taken by people actually in the video booth) that the “Siebold” voting machines are rigged. When the voter touches and selects a candidate with an (R) next to his or her name, within a couple of seconds the selection switches, and the candidate with a (D) next to their name is selected. A voter who has his or her eyes only half open most likely won’t even notice this. Oh but Randy, that’s an isolated incident. Hmmm…not so sure. I have already seen reports that it has happened in Virginia, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts. Now. 2014. Reported by “early” voters.
What happened after that? These “behind the scenes” forces managed to steal the election in 2012. Anyone remember that there were five (5) states that were “down to the wire” or “too close to call” in that election? And after the dust settled and people had time to filter through the results is when they discovered that Obama had won 100% of the vote in a couple of counties. Also that the total number of votes cast was more then the number of registered voters in some places. And indeed the majority of this happened in those states with “tight” races, but not all. I remember that “incidents” were reported in about a dozen states.
Who heard about this? Well if your news source is CNN or the NBC Nightly News you surely didn’t. It is CRITICALLY important to understand that these media are owned and controlled by the same creeps that hide behind the stage curtain in Washington, D. C. They are not honest journalists that report the news in a neutral way. The guy who sits at the NBC desk, Brian Williams, was the same one who was quoted as saying that he felt vibrations down his leg when the determination was made back in 2008 that Obama had won. Well–maybe it was at the time of the inaguration. My memory is fading. Is this a problem–that this man shares his prejudice or bias over the airwaves? I withhold comment. I only say that there is a HUGE difference between Brian Williams and Walter Cronkite. Huge difference.
The next question becomes, what was done after complaints about possible election fraud and even lawsuits were filed after the 2012 election? We all know the answer–nothing. Next we ask, “If this America and we believe that we have a solid democracy here, then why not?”
Mostly it is because the American people don’t INSIST. Their first “disability” is caused by the media as suggested before. When people do not even HEAR about the “dark” things that happen, then how could they ever get upset and take action? This is SUPER CRITICAL. Many, many, many, many times I have said that if you have “Liked” NBC Nightly News, CNN, PBS, CBS News or the others, and that is what flows down your Facebook timeline–please un-Like that now. It is pure rubbish.
TOO MUCH TRUST IN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA
Next of course–and this is related to the paragraph above–that we trust WAY TOO MUCH in the government and that “they” would never do anything really bad. Yes people all say that they know that politicians are corrupt. But how corrupt? How much does the average person know? My answer–not enough.
Let’s just talk about ONE person here–Attorney General Eric Holder. Yes, yes, he is on the way out. He has resigned and will step down from his throne as soon as a suitable replacement is found. Suitable? What does THAT mean? Read on. The answer will become painfully obvious. Many believe that he resigned because the “walls are closing in on him” and he needs to high-tail it before it’s too late. But Randy–why do you say the walls are closing in on him?
I don’t have notes here to remember a lot of details, so I just have to share the high points from memory. Maybe his first official deed after being appointed by our illustrious president was to refuse to prosecute the Black Panther members who were caught on Election Day 2008 (on video even), standing on the steps of a few polling places in Philadelphia with baseball bats in their hands. Were they gathering for a baseball or softball game? Not quite. Their aim was clearly to intimidate people–particularly white people–and dissuade them from going in to vote. Now remember–this guy Holder is the #1 law enforcement official in the country.
MORE ABOUT ERIC HOLDER
I don’t remember if it was exactly the next thing, but along came “Fast and Furious.” What was that? To make a long story short, it was a plan to allow the sale of firearms to various groups that traffic drugs and people across the southern border. They wanted these weapons, all of which of course can be traced by serial number, to “surface” at crime scenes in either the USA or Mexico. The primary “movers” in all this were within the AFT, the Alcohol-Firearms-Tobacco division of the DOJ. Why would they want that? So they could point a finger at these incidents and say, “Do you see this American people? This is why we need tougher anti-gun laws” (and eventually try to outlaw them completely of course).
What do we know about this? Not enough of course. But as always bits and pieces of incrimination information surface. From where? From lots of places, but very often it is from “insiders,” people who currently or formerly worked within key organizations. At some point their conscious won’t allow them to keep silent, so they spill the beans. It is clear that Eric Holder perjured himself (lied) during Congressional investigations. He was even declared in contempt of Congress. What has been done? Nothing. After all he is the one who sits in the highest chair within the organization that is responsible for seeing that justice is done. The other possibility is that Congress would have the stones to push the matter further. But they won’t, not in small part because Brian Williams and others will point fingers and yell, “Racist!!” This has been a HUGE weapon used to keep both Obama and Holder out of trouble.
ARIZONA AND THE BORDER
Remember a few years back when Arizona passed a law that fortified their internal laws and stepped up the processing of people caught in the state illegally? “Racist!!” I read the law–all 9 pages of it. It was not unfair. It was did not include anything that called for unequal treatment of “people of color.” It said that if a person is stopped by a law enforcement officer they will be asked to show their driver’s license, vehicle registration, and proof of insurance coverage. Have YOU ever been stopped and asked to show those things? I have. It’s normal. Next of course is if the driver cannot produce these documents further steps are taken. Usually a citation is issued, requiring that the person provide the documents within a few days. What is discriminatory here? Only of course if the person cannot produce the documents (because they don’t have them) then the case is forwarded to ICE for follow-up. I don’t know what reasonable person would be opposed to this. Lots of people charged that “racial profiling” would be the result of this law. Does racial profiling exist? Yes it does. Did the law call for racial profiling? No it didn’t.
What did Eric Holder do? He filed suit against the state of Arizona, based on the idea that the state did not have the RIGHT to do what was supposed to be the job of the federal government. Of course that was the very problem in the first place–that the federal government wasn’t doing what it was supposed to do and enforce the immigration laws.
The Arizona Legislature was responding to the cries of ranchers and others that live in the southern part of the state, and whose properties and livlihoods were being trampled by the unrestricted flow of illegals and traffickers. At least twice I have posted a photo of a sign (one of several) that sits in the barren desert just south of Interstate 8 in Arizona at a point where the highway goes in an east-west direction. The sign warns recreational users of a high volume of illegal activity in the area, and suggests that they confine their activities to the north side of the highway. So there you have it. The BLM (Bureu of Land Management) has basicaly ceded all those many square miles of U. S. land to the illegal activity–essentially saying that they can’t stop it. (Or they don’t WANT to stop it).
HOW THIS AFFECTS US AND DEMOCRACY
Arizona serves as just one example of what is happening. The corrupt news media, who again I say is controlled by the very people who back Obama and Holder and all the other creeps, picks up on stories like the Arizona story I just described. Millions of Americans hear this crap and next they are also screaming that Arizona is “racist” and it’s terrible, just terrible.
A few states have pushed “voter ID” laws that require people to present valid documentation before they can vote. Public surveys have been taken that show that most Americans think this is a GOOD idea. But what about Eric Holder? What does HE do? He files suit against these states. Why, what’s his point? He claims that such laws “intimidate” some people, particularly economically-disadvantaged people and discourage them from voting. We know who those people are. Their name is spelled I-L-L-E-G-A-L A-L-I-E-N.
What else? A year or so ago Florida decided to go through the state voters lists and purge them of people who were pushing up daisies (deceased). Is there a problem with that? Doesn’t it seem like an appropriate thing for people who work within the elections system at the state level to do? Well, if you ask Eric Holder it’s not. Again he filed a lawsuit to stop this from happening. For states (or anyone else) to do such things simply does not fit in their plans.
Only two days ago news appeared stating that the state of Illinois is moving legislation that would permit non-citizens to OPENLY vote in that state. You see, this is the ultimate goal of Obama, Holder, and all the others. They WANT people to vote who have no legal right to vote. It is not a secret that 90+ percent of such people vote Democrat because they are beholden to those who “give them the goodies.” That’s YOUR tax money paying for the healthcare, food stamps, and education of the children for people that should be detained and sent out of the country. Or at least the laws that prevent an employer from hiring someone with no legal right should be enforced. That requires a minute to check and compare the name and Social Security number on the documents presented by a job applicant to see if there is a match. But no. These things will not happen. And anyone who tries to do the right thing will be sued.
I could go on and on ad naseum, “talking” about these creeps and what they do to interfere with fairness and democracy in America. But I have already worn out my fingertips. Again I express my hope that more people will take the time to do their own research. TURN OFF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA. You will never find truth there. Everything I have said here can be verified many times over within just minutes by anyone who bothers to look. God bless America. Oooopps…as many know it is not “politically correct” to say that anymore.